Essay about mercy killing

Cite this page
  1. Euthanasia and Mercy Killing
  2. It frees up hospital beds and resources
  3. Euthanasia - Wikipedia
  4. Mercy killing Essay

Read more. This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets CSS enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets CSS if you are able to do so.

This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving. Ethics guide. Ethics of euthanasia - introduction. On this page What is Euthanasia?

Euthanasia and Mercy Killing

Page options Print this page. What is Euthanasia? The term is derived from the Greek word euthanatos which means easy death. The ethics of euthanasia Euthanasia raises a number of agonising moral dilemmas: is it ever right to end the life of a terminally ill patient who is undergoing severe pain and suffering?

There are also a number of arguments based on practical issues.

Essay on Euthanasia (Mercy Death) in India II SSC II Bank II Other Exams

Some people are really lucky to wake up a few days before they get Mercy Killed. Otherwise, what can we say about those patients who could be reawaken two days after mercy killing? Of course, we may never know the answer to this question when the things are already done. According to the general psychological factor , the major people are highly depressed and confident that their death is better than living with their pain. People in grief are affected greatly and cannot make wise or careful decisions.

  • process essay on planning a vacation.
  • Do You Agree or Disagree With Euthanasia or Mercy Killing??
  • help me write a good thesis statement?
  • was jay gatsby great essay.
  • Published under category: Writing Help Convenience | 2015-06-03 22:23:23 UTC;

Sometimes such cases need more time to pass. Sometimes after the deep wounds were healed, they understand that they can cope with it. For instance, the mothers may have the choice to allow their ill babies with some mental or physical disorders to born or kill it unborn to prevent suffering for the rest of their life. As a rule, mothers who decide to give a chance for their babies, never regret it after looking to their eyes. Moreover, they could obtain the great power and wish to have another babies.

Similarly, the example of many disabled people who inspire healthy people with their strength and motivation for life. In this case, the psychological weakness is the main reason of death wishing. As a solution, if patients during their treatment will be supported with antidepressants, the hard moments would be tolerated smoother and, what is more important, they would avoid any miserable thoughts about death.

It frees up hospital beds and resources

Sreenivas, Sastry, and Naga Sai That is why, I believe that mercy killing is an act that is totally against the idea of living peacefully. Except the criminals or terminally ill people, there are a lot of innocent and healthy people who undergo to mercy killing only because it is allowed and they are depressed. Consequently, the first reason why I am against mercy killing highly depends on the mental competency of the patients as after years of pain and suffering, it is definitely under a huge question. Also, the patients might accept mercy killing after pressure and persuasion from their families, doctors, or caretakers as they might work on persuading them that it is better for them to die than to live in pain.

Carol Gill and Larry Voss considered this action, by family or caretaker, as a form of guilt as they will make the patients feel. In case, if they suicide, it will be better for they families and for the people they love and care about, but this action may not be exclusively the wishes of the patients. Also, patients who are in comas may also be subjected to Mercy Killing with the validation that they are in pain.

However, it is impossible to say for certain that these patients feel pain or the degree of pain that they could feel. Gill and Voss So, Mercy Killing under this situation cannot be justified. Secondly, mercy killing is an act that might work as an obstacle to develop medical work due to reduced hope and motivation for both doctors and patients.

For example, when the AIDS virus appeared, many people thought that it is incurable. Those who suffered from the virus were totally scared and they opted to suicide. However, due to medical development, doctors managed to make this virus manageable and patients lived meaningful long lives. According to Joann Vicarel, many physicians do agree that it is impossible to point out which diseases are incurable. Technological and medical development in the modern life take place at a fast pace, but when we apply mercy killing, we are killing these hopes.

Savage How can something be called right or positive when it negates the possibility for others to receive better treatment in the future? By randomly killing those deemed incurable or terminally ill people, we also kill the motivation for the development of better medicines or procedures that may save people in the future or maybe eliminate the sickness completely.

The third reason, why I think that mercy killing is a refused solution, is that it destroys the fabric of human civilization. Civilization was built upon sympathy and the respect of life. In the ancient world people who were affected by incurable illnesses were left to die. But the rule of law was founded upon moral and ethical principles.

Many cases have been witnessed where the caretakers take upon their own hands to terminate the lives of their patients. By allowing mercy killing, we will hear a lot of similar stories and such cases will be accepted as the normality of social life.

Euthanasia - Wikipedia

Savage However, Dr. But when the right of one person trespasses upon the rights of other people, that right becomes negated by law.

When Mercy Killing is allowed for one person, it may act as a priority for others suffering from the same condition. They are persuaded to follow the same actions against their wishes. However, society cannot take chance with mercy killing as the future of others depending only on the wishes of a few individuals. But body is mortal. In life there could be multiple problems. Some problems could be life threatening. There are some stages in life where one has to make decisions. Imagine you are in a place where you lost all your vital abilities and you have to spend your entire life like that.

Your family and friend are in pain too just like you are in pain. What would you do? Euthanasia is and act where a person. Should Euthanasia be Legalised This essay will explore several different and varied opinions about whether or not euthanasia should be legalised. Euthanasia is the Greek word for easy death, but is often referred to as mercy killing. There are two main forms of euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is when a terminally ill patient expresses the wish to be euthenised.

Mercy killing Essay

Active euthanasia is when a Doctor decides that it is in the best interest of the patient to be euthenised. Euthanasia: The main purpose of this essay is to focus on the controversy surrounding the issue of euthanasia and analyse the pros and cons arguments regarding euthanasia.

Cookies on the BBC website

This essay will aim to analyse in further details the complexity of the matter regarding euthanasia and will argue the pros and cons of euthanasia and will also debate the major impact that legalising euthanasia might have on the society, on the medical industry and.